Possible iQOO Pad Ultra Model Hits Geekbench With 16GB RAM

A vivo tablet carrying model number iPA2691 has appeared repeatedly on Geekbench with about 16GB of memory, Android 17 and Qualcomm platform identifier QTI SM8975. Earlier reporting links iPA2691 to the upcoming iQOO Pad Ultra, but Geekbench itself does not use that product name. That distinction matters: iQOO has already officially confirmed that the Pad Ultra exists, yet it has not publicly stated that iPA2691 is the tablet’s retail model number.

The benchmark story is more complicated than one screenshot. One early report cited a very low Geekbench 6 result around 1,754 single-core and 6,661 multi-core. Direct entries for the same iPA2691 model now span from roughly 1,763/6,740 to 4,027/11,701, with other runs in between. That enormous spread makes any single pre-release score a poor guide to final performance. The stronger evidence is the system information: Android 17, approximately 15.2GB of available memory, an eight-core SM8975 platform and a 3+3+2 CPU layout with reported clocks reaching about 5.01GHz.

What Geekbench actually shows for vivo iPA2691

The direct Geekbench 6 entries are unusually informative at the system-information level. They identify the model as vivo iPA2691, not iQOO Pad Ultra. The operating system is Android 17. Available memory is listed at 15.20GB, which strongly supports a test unit with 16GB of physical RAM after normal system reservation.

The CPU field reads QTI SM8975. Geekbench shows eight cores in three clusters: three cores at up to approximately 3.74GHz, three at up to 4.03GHz and two at up to 5.01GHz. The reported governor is walt, an Android scheduling clue rather than proof of final gaming behavior. These clocks and scheduler details come from pre-release benchmark entries and should not automatically be treated as final shipping values.

Geekbench also labels version 6 as a legacy benchmark for modern hardware and recommends Geekbench 7. That warning is important because Geekbench 6 and Geekbench 7 scores are not interchangeable. Any comparison in this article therefore stays inside Geekbench 6 unless otherwise stated.

Does Geekbench prove iPA2691 is the iQOO Pad Ultra?

No. Geekbench proves that a vivo-branded device with model number iPA2691 exists in its database and has been tested with the listed software, memory and CPU platform. The benchmark page does not print “iQOO Pad Ultra.”

The connection comes from earlier certification and leak reporting. iPA2691 had already been described by Chinese reporting as an iQOO flagship compact tablet before the Geekbench entries appeared. That makes the association plausible and useful, but it remains a reported mapping rather than an official statement from iQOO.

The Pad Ultra name itself is already official

This is an important correction to early rumor coverage. iQOO has officially named the product iQOO Pad Ultra and describes it as a new gaming-oriented compact tablet. The company’s China site now lists Pad Ultra for reservation, and official teaser material has confirmed a late-September launch window alongside the iQOO 16 family.

On September 15, iQOO separately confirmed that the iQOO 16 smartphone will launch in China on September 29. FrediTech has not found an equally explicit statement assigning Pad Ultra to that exact September 29 date, so this article continues to use late September for the tablet rather than silently upgrading the launch date.

Why the early 1,754/6,661 score is misleading on its own

91mobiles reported a Geekbench 6 result of approximately 1,754 single-core and 6,661 multi-core for iPA2691 on September 14. For a next-generation flagship Qualcomm platform, those numbers looked surprisingly weak. Even the report itself cautioned that the score could represent an early prototype or unfinished software.

That caution is now reinforced by direct Geekbench results. The same model later posted dramatically higher figures without changing the basic system identification. It would therefore be misleading to conclude that Pad Ultra is “slow” based on the lowest result. Equally, the highest result should not be sold as guaranteed retail performance.

Newer iPA2691 runs are dramatically faster

All four direct entries show the same 3+3+2 CPU topology and the same reported cluster clocks: approximately 3.74GHz, 4.03GHz and 5.01GHz. Scores may continue to change as more pre-release tests are uploaded.

Why pre-release Geekbench scores can vary so much

There is no single proven explanation for the spread. Possible factors include firmware maturity, scheduler tuning, power profiles, thermal state, background processes, engineering software, fan behavior, CPU governor settings and benchmark anomalies. A development device can also be deliberately tested at different clocks or power limits.

The unusual 3,089 single-core / 11,687 multi-core result shows why the problem cannot be explained simply as “faster firmware.” Some workloads in that run perform strongly while others remain much weaker. That pattern is more consistent with changing test conditions or software behavior than with a stable final consumer profile.

Geekbench 6 is now a legacy benchmark for modern hardware

Geekbench’s own result pages state that Geekbench 6 is a legacy version and recommend Geekbench 7 for modern hardware. That does not make these runs useless; it means they should be interpreted within their own version and not mixed with Geekbench 7 scores.

For readers who want more background on what CPU benchmarks can and cannot tell you, FrediTech’s smartphone performance metrics guide explains why benchmark numbers need workload, thermal and software context.

What QTI SM8975 tells us—and what it does not

SM8975 is the platform identifier printed by Geekbench. Reporting associates it with Qualcomm’s next-generation flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6 family. Geekbench itself does not write “Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6” on the result page.

Internal platform identifiers are stronger evidence than a random social-media claim, but commercial naming can change. Qualcomm may also introduce different bins, Pro variants or clocks. Until Qualcomm publishes the retail name and iQOO names the processor in Pad Ultra, FrediTech treats “Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6” as a well-supported association rather than a Geekbench-confirmed marketing name.

The CPU reaches up to 5.01GHz in current listings

The two fastest cores are reported at about 5.01GHz, which is eye-catching for a mobile platform. Clock speed alone does not determine performance. Instructions per clock, cache design, memory subsystem, scheduler behavior, sustained power limits and thermal headroom all matter. This is another reason the Pad Ultra’s cooling system may prove more interesting than the peak frequency itself.

16GB RAM and Android 17 appear consistently

Every direct run checked for this article reports approximately 15.20GB of memory and Android 17. That is strong evidence of a 16GB test configuration. It does not prove 16GB will be the only or maximum retail option. Reports suggesting a 12GB model remain unconfirmed until iQOO publishes the memory and storage lineup.

Android 17 is likewise direct benchmark evidence, but it does not establish the final OriginOS version, update-policy length or global software branding. FrediTech’s OriginOS 7 coverage provides useful context around vivo/iQOO’s Android 17 software generation.

iQOO has confirmed an 8.8-inch compact gaming tablet

The 8.8-inch display size is official. That gives Pad Ultra a different role from the large 12- to 13-inch productivity tablets that dominate the Android flagship market. A smaller panel can be easier to hold for long sessions, fit stretchable controllers more naturally and reduce wrist fatigue.

Actual ergonomics still require hands-on testing. A compact tablet may improve portability while sacrificing the larger canvas preferred for multitasking or keyboard use. iQOO is clearly prioritizing handheld gaming over desktop-style productivity.

The 5.74mm, 298g design is unusually compact

iQOO’s official teaser lists a 5.74mm body and 298g weight. Those are noteworthy figures for a performance-oriented tablet containing active cooling. Measurement details such as whether the stated thickness excludes the camera bump or raised vent areas should be checked once complete specifications are published.

The built-in 14,500rpm cooling fan is official

This is no longer a leak. iQOO has confirmed a 30 × 30 × 3.5mm internal fan, a quoted 1,661mm² heat-dissipation area, up to 14,500rpm fan speed and a maximum airflow claim of 0.94 CFM.

Active cooling can move heat continuously rather than relying entirely on a metal chassis, vapor chamber, graphite and software throttling. In theory that can help sustain CPU and GPU clocks during long gaming sessions. It may also reduce hotspots at the surface.

The trade-offs are equally important. A fan introduces moving parts, can produce audible noise or vibration, consumes power and requires venting that may collect dust. None of those concerns can be resolved from teaser specifications. Independent thermal and acoustic testing will be essential.

Why active cooling could matter more than a peak Geekbench score

Geekbench is a short CPU workload. Gaming performance depends on sustained CPU and GPU behavior, not just a burst score. A gaming tablet can look spectacular in a brief benchmark but lose performance after 15 or 30 minutes if heat forces clocks downward.

Pad Ultra’s real test will be games such as Genshin Impact, Honkai: Star Rail and Wuthering Waves under extended load. Reviewers should measure frame-time consistency, GPU throttling, surface temperatures, fan noise and battery drain. CPU benchmarks alone cannot reveal those results.

The same discipline appears in FrediTech’s POCO F9 Ultra vs F9 Pro analysis, where launch performance claims are separated from sustained gaming and thermal testing.

OLED, 165Hz and the roughly 9,000mAh battery still need verification

The 8.8-inch size is official; the OLED panel type remains reported rather than officially confirmed in the sources checked here. Reports also mention up to 165Hz, but iQOO has not yet published the complete display specification sheet for Pad Ultra.

Likewise, a battery around the 9,000mAh class and 66W charging continue to appear in leak and certification-related reporting. They should remain attributed until iQOO confirms the capacity and charging specification for the retail tablet. Reported Shadow Black/Ender Black and Star Silver/Armor Silver color names also vary by translation and should not yet be treated as final English marketing names.

The controller and rear grip make its gaming intent obvious

iQOO has teased a stretchable game controller with a dedicated USB-C port, micro-switch controls and a Hall-effect joystick. A separate rear grip is designed to improve handheld ergonomics. Those accessories reinforce the idea that Pad Ultra is meant to behave more like a dedicated mobile gaming device than a scaled-down office tablet.

Pricing for the controller, rear grip and any bundles remains unknown. The accessories’ exact retail availability should also be confirmed at launch rather than assumed from teaser imagery.

When will iQOO Pad Ultra launch?

iQOO has officially said late September 2026 in China. The iQOO 16 smartphone is now confirmed for September 29 at 19:00 China time, but Pad Ultra has not been explicitly tied to that exact date in the official material FrediTech could verify. Until that changes, “late September” is the safer wording.

Will iQOO Pad Ultra launch globally?

No global release has been announced. That means there is no confirmed India, Europe, UK, Southeast Asia or Gulf-region date. iQOO’s previous tablet distribution provides context but does not determine the Pad Ultra strategy.

A China launch can still matter to international buyers because gaming tablets are frequently imported, but warranty, language, software services, charger standards and after-sales support can differ. Buyers should wait for an official global announcement before treating imported availability as equivalent to a local launch.

What we still need to learn at launch

FrediTech verdict

The most important Geekbench story is the variability, not the highest or lowest number. vivo iPA2691 has produced results ranging from distinctly weak to clearly flagship-class, while the underlying system information remains largely consistent. That is a strong sign that pre-release hardware and software are still being tuned or tested under different conditions.

The more durable evidence is that iPA2691 uses Android 17, approximately 16GB RAM and QTI SM8975 with an unusual high-frequency eight-core layout. Separately, iQOO has already confirmed that Pad Ultra is a real compact gaming tablet with an 8.8-inch screen, 5.74mm body, 298g weight and built-in active cooling.

The real performance question is therefore not whether one Geekbench run reaches 4,000 single-core. It is whether the cooling system can sustain CPU and GPU performance during long gaming loads without excessive noise, heat or battery drain. That answer will require retail hardware, mature firmware, GPU benchmarks and real games.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is iQOO Pad Ultra officially confirmed?

Yes. iQOO has officially named the Pad Ultra and confirmed a late-September China launch.

What is vivo iPA2691?

It is a vivo-branded tablet model appearing in Geekbench and earlier certification reporting. Reports associate it with iQOO Pad Ultra.

Is iPA2691 definitely the iQOO Pad Ultra?

No. The association is strong, but iQOO has not explicitly confirmed that model-number mapping.

How much RAM does iPA2691 have?

Geekbench reports about 15.20GB available memory, consistent with a 16GB test configuration.

What processor appears in Geekbench?

Geekbench identifies QTI SM8975.

Is SM8975 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 6?

Reporting associates SM8975 with Qualcomm’s next flagship Snapdragon family, but Geekbench itself does not print that commercial name.

What are the Geekbench scores?

Verified Geekbench 6 runs range from about 1,763/6,740 to 4,027/11,701, with other runs in between.

Why are the scores so different?

Pre-release firmware, power modes, thermal state, scheduler tuning, background activity or benchmark anomalies are possible explanations. No single cause is proven.

Does Pad Ultra have a cooling fan?

Yes. iQOO officially confirms a built-in fan rated up to 14,500rpm.

How big is the screen?

iQOO officially confirms an 8.8-inch display.

Is it OLED?

OLED is reported by leaks and secondary coverage, but was not officially confirmed in the sources checked for this article.

How big is the battery?

Reports suggest a battery around the 9,000mAh class; iQOO has not yet confirmed the final capacity.

When will Pad Ultra launch?

iQOO says late September 2026 in China.

Will Pad Ultra launch globally?

No global launch has been announced.

How much will it cost?

iQOO has not announced pricing.

Sources and Further Reading

• Geekbench — vivo iPA2691, 4,027 / 11,701
• Geekbench — vivo iPA2691, 3,910 / 11,400
• Geekbench — vivo iPA2691, 3,089 / 11,687
• Geekbench — vivo iPA2691, 1,763 / 6,740
• IT Home — official Pad Ultra real-device and cooling details
• IT Home — official fan and gaming-accessory teasers
• 91mobiles — September 14 benchmark report